I just read this thread... many thanks for applying the fix.
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Done in r16942.
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting
>>
Done in r16942.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting
SCTP exclusivity to LOW.
Fine with me.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting
> SCTP exclusivity to LOW.
Fine with me.
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres w
I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting
SCTP exclusivity to LOW.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed:
http://www.open-mp
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed:
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php
>
> (no one replied, so no action was taken)
>
> Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being bu
Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php
(no one replied, so no action was taken)
Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of
environment is it?
On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gle
Hi,
SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1
but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max
exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should not
define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero?
--
Gleb.
