Okay, the list at least is getting smaller!
Jeff: you now have the two oldest PRs sitting out there for more than a year
now. One states it is being held because the Forum can’t decide something, so
maybe it should be shelved?
The other is about clock_gettime, which I believe we resolved since
Thanks George - wasn’t picking on you, just citing the oldest one on the list.
Once that goes in, I’ll be poking the next :-)
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:10 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> Ralph,
>
> I updated the TCP-related pending PR. It offers a better solution that what
> we have today, unfor
Ralph,
I updated the TCP-related pending PR. It offers a better solution that what
we have today, unfortunately not perfect as it would require additions to
the configure. Waiting for reviews.
George.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:12 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
> Thanks to those who made a fi
Thanks to those who made a first pass at these old PRs. The oldest one is now
dated Dec 2015 - nearly a two-year old change for large messages over the TCP
BTL, waiting for someone to commit.
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 7:34 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>
> Hey folks
>
> This is getting ridiculous
Hey folks
This is getting ridiculous - we have PRs sitting on GitHub that are more than a
year old! If they haven’t been committed in all that time, they can’t possibly
be worth anything now.
Would people _please_ start paying attention to their PRs? Either close them,
or update/commit them.
Hey folks
We’re seeing a number of stale PRs hanging around again - these are PRs that
were submitted against master (in some cases, months ago) that cleared CI and
were never committed. Could people please take a look at their PRs and either
commit them or delete them?
We are trying to get 3.
