Hi all,
A new run-time test for System V shared memory support has been added
- hopefully addressing all of the concerns voiced earlier in this
thread. If not, please let me know. I've tested the changes on
various Linux systems, OS X, and Solaris 10.
Testing is always appreciated!
htt
On May 5, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
Point noted. But actually -- can you give specific reasons as to
why a user should care? Keep in mind that this would be a short-
lived fork'ed process -- not "spawn" in the MPI sense of the w
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
Point noted. But actually -- can you give specific reasons as to why a user should care?
Keep in mind that this would be a short-lived fork'ed process -- not "spawn"
in the MPI sense of the word.
You might be r
On May 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
> > Point noted. But actually -- can you give specific reasons as to why a
> > user should care? Keep in mind that this would be a short-lived fork'ed
> > process -- not "spawn" in the MPI sense of the word.
>
> You might be running the job un
