"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> Before Fortran 08, there was no Fortran equivalent of C's (void*).
> Hence, it was actually impossible -- using pure Fortran -- to have
> Fortran prototypes for MPI subroutines that take a choice buffer
> (e.g., MPI_Send, which takes a (void*) buffer argument in
On 08/27/2014 08:32 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone give me a quick overview of the tkr/ignore-tkr split in the fortran
bindings?
Heh. How much do you want to know? How far down the Fortran rabbit hole do
you want to go?
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Can someone give me a quick overview of the tkr/ignore-tkr split in the
> fortran bindings?
Heh. How much do you want to know? How far down the Fortran rabbit hole do
you want to go? :-)
> In the process of updating the Fedora openmp
Can someone give me a quick overview of the tkr/ignore-tkr split in the
fortran bindings? In the process of updating the Fedora openmpi
packages from 1.8.1 in Fedora 21/22 to 1.8.2 we seem to have gone from
libmpi_usempi.so to libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so and I'm not sure why.
checking Fortran
