Thanks for spotting the 'printf'. I removed it as it was for debugging
in a very early stage. I committed the patch without the 'printf' to svn.
Adrian
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:42:39PM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Looks okay to me - I see you left a "printf" statement in
> plm
Looks okay to me - I see you left a "printf" statement in
plm_base_launch_support.c, so you might want to make that an
opal_output_verbose or something.
On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> This patch
>
> https://lisas.de/git/?p=open-mpi.git;a=commitdiff;h=14ec7f42baab882e345948
This patch
https://lisas.de/git/?p=open-mpi.git;a=commitdiff;h=14ec7f42baab882e345948ff79c4f75f5084bbbf
introduces unique collective ids for the checkpoint/restart code and
with this applied it seems to work pretty good. As this patch also
touches non-CR code it would be good if someone could hav
