It looks like I was too quick to blame libltdl.
A build of the current 'master' tarball on the same system and identical
configure arguments fails as seen below.
While the failure is not identical, it is also a out-of-memory error.
I am currently assuming that an rlimit has been lowered on this sy
Howard,
This was seen on NERSC's Carver.
-Paul
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Howard Pritchard
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for checking in depth into this. Just to help in determining how
> to proceed, which national center is this?
>
> Howard
>
>
> 2015-02-02 19:35 GMT-07:00 Paul Hargrove
Hi Paul,
Thanks for checking in depth into this. Just to help in determining how to
proceed, which national center is this?
Howard
2015-02-02 19:35 GMT-07:00 Paul Hargrove :
> Below is one example of what happens when you assume that you can trust
> the libltdl installed an otherwise very wel
Below is one example of what happens when you assume that you can trust the
libltdl installed an otherwise very well maintained national center. I
think this is another "vote" for continuing to embed (a working) libltdl.
-Paul
$ mpirun -mca btl sm,self -np 2 examples/ring_c'
libibverbs: Warning:
