Sweet. Let's followup on that PR. Thanks!
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 3:10 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> i filed PR #845 https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/845
>
> could you please have a look ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gilles
>
> On 8/30/2015 9:20 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>> ok,
Jeff,
i filed PR #845 https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/845
could you please have a look ?
Cheers,
Gilles
On 8/30/2015 9:20 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
ok, will do
basically, I simply have to
#include "ompi/mpi/c/profile/defines.h"
if configure set the WANT_MPI_PROFILING macro
(since
ok, will do
basically, I simply have to
#include "ompi/mpi/c/profile/defines.h"
if configure set the WANT_MPI_PROFILING macro
(since this is an AM_CONDITIONAL, I will have the Makefile.am sets the CPP
flags for the compiler)
makes sense ?
/* the patch will be pretty large since all *_f files are
On Aug 27, 2015, at 3:25 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>
> I am lost ...
Fortran does that to ya. ;-)
> from ompi/mpi/fortran/mpif-h/profile/palltoall_f.c
>
> void ompi_alltoall_f(char *sendbuf, MPI_Fint *sendcount, MPI_Fint *sendtype,
>char *recvbuf, MPI_Fint *recvcount,
I am lost ...
from ompi/mpi/fortran/mpif-h/profile/palltoall_f.c
void ompi_alltoall_f(char *sendbuf, MPI_Fint *sendcount, MPI_Fint *sendtype,
char *recvbuf, MPI_Fint *recvcount, MPI_Fint *recvtype,
MPI_Fint *comm, MPI_Fint *ierr)
{
[...]
c_ierr = M
On Aug 25, 2015, at 11:03 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> This seems to be the case only with the TKR interface. All the others are
> either calling the OMPI version directly (mpif-h), or are calling some other
> internal (or weak symbol function).
Yes, those might need to be updated. Not it!
This seems to be the case only with the TKR interface. All the others are
either calling the OMPI version directly (mpif-h), or are calling some
other internal (or weak symbol function).
George.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Bert Wesarg
wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 02:44 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
On 08/25/2015 02:44 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
Folks,
I ran some basic tests with IPM profiler-like
https://github.com/nerscadmin/IPM and found that when fortran calls an
mpi subroutine, this is accounted twice.
IPM defines both MPI_* subroutines and their fortran mpi_*_ counterpart.
since t
Folks,
I ran some basic tests with IPM profiler-like
https://github.com/nerscadmin/IPM and found that when fortran calls an
mpi subroutine, this is accounted twice.
IPM defines both MPI_* subroutines and their fortran mpi_*_ counterpart.
since the ompi fortran calls the MPI_* symbol (and not the P
