I looked at that, too -- I think the only reason to have 2 files is that
mpi_portable_platform.h is included by mpi.h (its used for knowing how to
define __mpi_interface_deprecated__ in mpi.h), and is therefore installed.
opal_portable_platform.h is not installed.
On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:40 AM,
All -
Is there a reason we have both opal/include/opal_portable_platform.h and
ompi/include/mpi_portable_platform.h? If they're always supposed to have
the same content (which appears to be the case), then it seems like
building mpi_portable_platform.h from opal_portable_platform.h at build
time
