Re: [OMPI devel] question on ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS

2015-11-11 Thread Mark Santcroos
If Dave says it's ok then it must be! :) (Thanks for the explanation) > On 11 Nov 2015, at 23:04 , Ralph Castain wrote: > > Every orted maintains knowledge of where every process in the DVM is located > in case some local client needs information or to otherwise communicate > out-of-band with

Re: [OMPI devel] question on ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS

2015-11-11 Thread Ralph Castain
Every orted maintains knowledge of where every process in the DVM is located in case some local client needs information or to otherwise communicate out-of-band with some non-local peer. The RTE has no idea of the possible communication pattern, so we err on the side of more info to avoid someti

Re: [OMPI devel] question on ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS

2015-11-11 Thread Mark Santcroos
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 22:43 , Ralph Castain wrote: > You must have the “-d” option set on the orte-dvm cmd line? Yes. > You’ll get one of those from every daemon in the job each time you launch an > app. Ok, that explains the number better :) Why is every orted aware of a job on another orted?

Re: [OMPI devel] question on ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS

2015-11-11 Thread Ralph Castain
You must have the “-d” option set on the orte-dvm cmd line? You’ll get one of those from every daemon in the job each time you launch an app. > On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Mark Santcroos > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing this message an awful amount of times. (I.e. orders of magnitude > more

[OMPI devel] question on ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS

2015-11-11 Thread Mark Santcroos
Hi, I'm seeing this message an awful amount of times. (I.e. orders of magnitude more than I launch processes) [nid15897:18424] [[2305,0],103] orted:comm:process_commands() Processing Command: ORTE_DAEMON_ADD_LOCAL_PROCS How should I interpret that? Thanks Mark