Thanks Ralph, 4899e7fe fixes it!
Cheers,
Mark
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 20:48 , Ralph Castain wrote:
> Might not - there has been a very large amount of change over the last few
> months, and I confess I haven't been checking the DVM regularly. So let me
> take a step back and look at that code.
Ok.
> I'll also include the extensions you requ
Might not - there has been a very large amount of change over the last few
months, and I confess I haven't been checking the DVM regularly. So let me
take a step back and look at that code.
I'll also include the extensions you requested on the other email - I
didn't forget them, just somewhat over
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 20:34 , Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> Ouch - this is on current master HEAD?
Yep!
> I'm on travel right now, but I'll be back Fri evening and can look at it this
> weekend. Probably something silly that needs to be fixed.
Thanks!
Obviously I didn't check every single version
Ouch - this is on current master HEAD? I'm on travel right now, but I'll be
back Fri evening and can look at it this weekend. Probably something silly
that needs to be fixed.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> Hi (Ralph),
>
> Over the last months I have been focussing on
Hi (Ralph),
Over the last months I have been focussing on exec throughput, and not so much
on the application payload (read: mainly using /bin/sleep ;-)
As things are stabilising now, I returned my attention to "real" applications.
To discover that launching MPI applications (build with the same
