Re: [OMPI devel] sendi sm BTL function

2008-10-10 Thread George Bosilca
There is a simple (and good) reason not to have it in the upcoming release. By lack of time, I didn't manage to test it well enough. As I'm not 100% confident that it will not create any problems, I preferred to left it out of the 1.3. If you want to test it, please fell free to do so. And

[OMPI devel] sendi sm BTL function

2008-10-10 Thread Eugene Loh
Can someone tell me about mca_btl_sm_sendi()? In btl_sm.c, I see that it's commented out of the structure "mca_btl_sm". It seems to me that pingpong latency over shared memory in OMPI isn't as fast as certain "competitors". If I put mca_btl_sm_sendi back in, it seems to improve the pingpong