Ralph H Castain wrote:
On 7/11/08 7:48 AM, "Terry Dontje" wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Check that -- Ralph and I talked more about #1383 and have come up
with a decent/better solution that a) is not wonky and b) does not
involve MCA parameter synonyms. We're working on it in an hg and
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Check that -- Ralph and I talked more about #1383 and have come up
with a decent/better solution that a) is not wonky and b) does not
involve MCA parameter synonyms. We're working on it in an hg and
will put it back when done (probably withi
On 7/11/08 7:48 AM, "Terry Dontje" wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> Check that -- Ralph and I talked more about #1383 and have come up
>> with a decent/better solution that a) is not wonky and b) does not
>> involve MCA parameter synonyms. We're working on it in an hg and will
>> put it back w
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Check that -- Ralph and I talked more about #1383 and have come up
with a decent/better solution that a) is not wonky and b) does not
involve MCA parameter synonyms. We're working on it in an hg and will
put it back when done (probably within a business day or three).
So
Check that -- Ralph and I talked more about #1383 and have come up
with a decent/better solution that a) is not wonky and b) does not
involve MCA parameter synonyms. We're working on it in an hg and will
put it back when done (probably within a business day or three).
So I think the MCA sy
K, will do. Note that it turns out that we did not yet solve the
mpi_paffinity_alone issue, but we're working on it. I'm working on
the IOF issue ATM; will return to mpi_paffinity_alone in a bit...
On Jul 10, 2008, at 1:56 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I'm 100% with Brad on this. Please go ah
I'm 100% with Brad on this. Please go ahead and include this feature
in the 1.3.
george.
On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Brad Benton wrote:
I think this is very reasonable to go ahead and include for 1.3. I
find that preferable to a 1.3-specific "wonky" workaround. Plus,
this sounds lik
I think this is very reasonable to go ahead and include for 1.3. I find
that preferable to a 1.3-specific "wonky" workaround. Plus, this sounds
like something that is very good to have in general.
--brad
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> v1.3 RMs: Due to some recent work,
v1.3 RMs: Due to some recent work, the MCA parameter
mpi_paffinity_alone disappeared -- it was moved and renamed to be
opal_paffinity_alone. This is Bad because we have a lot of historical
precent based on the MCA param name "mpi_paffinity_alone" (FAQ, PPT
presentations, e-mails on public
