On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
BTW, are you guys waiting for us to commit that, or do we ever give you guys
SVN commit access?
Nadia is off today. She should commit it tomorrow.
Sylvain
On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
> Why do we want to set this value so low ? Well, just to see if it crashes :-)
That's a good reason! :-)
> More seriously, we're working on lowering the memory usage of the openib BTL,
> which is achieved at most by having only 1 send queue
Hi Jeff,
Why do we want to set this value so low ? Well, just to see if it crashes
:-)
More seriously, we're working on lowering the memory usage of the openib
BTL, which is achieved at most by having only 1 send queue element (at
very large scale, send queues prevail).
This "extreme" conf
I think your fix looks right.
But I'm getting my head warped trying to understand why you'd want numbers so
low (4, 2, 1) and exactly what our algorithm will re-post for numbers that low,
etc. Why do you want them so low?
On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:10 AM, nadia.derbey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference
