Hi Brian,
* Brian Barrett wrote on Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 06:53:12PM CET:
> On Jan 22, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET:
> >> It's the thread that never ends... :)
Hehe.
> > Which systems' m4 is capable of translating the con
On Jan 22, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Brian,
* Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET:
Ralf, I was wondering if you could take a look at what I actually
committed (r8779) and let me know what you think. It's mostly your
patch, but I rewrote a good chunk o
Hi Brian,
* Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET:
>
> Ralf, I was wondering if you could take a look at what I actually
> committed (r8779) and let me know what you think. It's mostly your
> patch, but I rewrote a good chunk of the m4 macro to take better
> advantage
Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:39:26PM CET:
> On Jan 21, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Should be fixed in patch below. Also, and I forgot to add this in the
> > first version of the patch: for configure, produce some output if the
> > SVN server is cont
On Jan 21, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Should be fixed in patch below. Also, and I forgot to add this in the
first version of the patch: for configure, produce some output if the
SVN server is contacted. I kept wondering why the configure script
halted for a while there in what wa
Hi Brian,
* Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 03:38:24AM CET:
>
> I'm running into some problems with the patch.
D'oh. 'T' is GNU sed-specific. I should've known that.
Should be fixed in patch below. Also, and I forgot to add this in the
first version of the patch: for configure, p
Ralf -
I'm running into some problems with the patch. Unfortunately, sed is
not my strong point. On Mac OS X 10.4 (possibly others), I get the
errors below. Any ideas? If you need a machine to play on, try
frood.osl.iu.edu -- your normal IU username / password should work.
Brian
[Run
Thanks for the patch - I'm going to try to grok it and then commit it
this evening.
Brian
On Jan 18, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello there,
Proposed below is a patch to remove the redundant instance of the
version algorithm, together with some cleanup (for unification of
the
