On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:48 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed that. However, I'm not sure that's the best way to do
> that. First, build-time symlinks are good. Second, I'd prefer always
> installing openmpi/opal/opal_portable_platform.h over having two copies of
> the same file in t
On 11/6/13 7:44 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote:
>I looked at that, too -- I think the only reason to have 2 files is that
>mpi_portable_platform.h is included by mpi.h (its used for knowing how to
>define __mpi_interface_deprecated__ in mpi.h), and is therefore
>installed. opal_portable_pla
