On Oct 17, 2011, at 8:55 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 18:23 , Ralph Castain wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:14 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>
>>> Ralph,
>>>
>>> I have a concern about the code below (snippet from the commit 25303). You
>>> moved the setting of proc_f
On Oct 17, 2011, at 18:23 , Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:14 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> Ralph,
>>
>> I have a concern about the code below (snippet from the commit 25303). You
>> moved the setting of proc_flags and proc_name in a function named set_arch.
>> As the name a
On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:14 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> I have a concern about the code below (snippet from the commit 25303). You
> moved the setting of proc_flags and proc_name in a function named set_arch.
> As the name and the lengthy comment above it indicate, the scope of this
>
Ralph,
I have a concern about the code below (snippet from the commit 25303). You
moved the setting of proc_flags and proc_name in a function named set_arch. As
the name and the lengthy comment above it indicate, the scope of this
particular function is to set the architecture of the remote pro
