Nope -- you're probably not missing anything. :-) I just saw the
change, and since this is a part of the code that I only *very
loosely* follow, I just wanted to make sure that the relevant portion
of the README was kept in sync. If they're still in sync, then
nothing needs to be changed
Hi Jeff,
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 09:31:42 am Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Can you update the top-level README as appropriate, too? There's a
> section about ob1 vs. cm priority, etc.
Err, I'd be happy to update, but there is no need, as it is the perfectly same
behavior, just now the prioity reporte
Rainer --
Can you update the top-level README as appropriate, too? There's a
section about ob1 vs. cm priority, etc.
Thanks!
On Aug 18, 2009, at 3:12 PM,
wrote:
Author: rusraink
Date: 2009-08-18 15:12:43 EDT (Tue, 18 Aug 2009)
New Revision: 21834
URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/o
