On Jan 21, 2012, at 23:33 , Ralph Castain wrote:
> We could - but the cmd line is already quite long, and that would make it
> worse.
We have up to 16k on most ssh-aware OSes (32k on most of the Linux), so today
we're still a light-year away from that. The extra 40 chars ("export
DYLD_LIBRARY
We could - but the cmd line is already quite long, and that would make it
worse. Doesn't strike me as all that complicated.
On Jan 21, 2012, at 7:26 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> How about instead of all the patches (r25758, r25762 and r25763) we just set
> both LD_LIBRARY_PATH and DYLD_LIBRARY_
How about instead of all the patches (r25758, r25762 and r25763) we just set
both LD_LIBRARY_PATH and DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH everywhere? One will get ignored on
Unix while the other on Darwin?
Another benefit will be to have a significantly cleaner...
george.
On Jan 21, 2012, at 18:48 , r...@osl.