On Apr 16, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Sounds fine, though note that we don't want ob1 itself to do this as
it inevitably adds overhead that translates into latency. Instead, we
want that functionality to be in a separate component for those people
who want to use it.
To drive this
Sounds fine, though note that we don't want ob1 itself to do this as
it inevitably adds overhead that translates into latency. Instead, we
want that functionality to be in a separate component for those people
who want to use it.
We did talk on a telecon earlier this week about the need to
Well, if reviving means making device failover work, then yes, in a way we
revived it ;)
We are currently making mostly experiments to figure out how to have device
failover working. No big fixes for now, and that's why we are posting here
before going further.
From what I understand, Rolf's
Hi,
We are also looking to get device failover working. However, for the
reasons cited by Ralph, we are using the OB1 PML as the starting point.
Also, similar to you, we do not need the checksumming feature or the
timed out retransmission that the dr PML provides.
Rolf
Ralph Castain wrot
Last anyone knew, the dr pml was dead - way out of date and
unmaintained. I gather that you folks have revived it and sync'd it
back up to the current ob1 module?
I don't think anyone really cares what is done with the dr module
itself. There are others working on failover modules, and ther
