Glad you found it - thanks for the update!
On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Sebastian Rinke wrote:
> I found the bug, it was me.
>
> After all I somehow missed to actually provide the MPI_Info argument to the
> spawn call.
> Instead I provided MPI_INFO_NULL.
>
> My apologies for this mistake.
>
I found the bug, it was me.
After all I somehow missed to actually provide the MPI_Info argument to the
spawn call.
Instead I provided MPI_INFO_NULL.
My apologies for this mistake.
Thank you for your efforts.
Sebastian
On Mar 22, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Sebastian Rinke wrote:
> Thanks for the quic
Thanks for the quick response.
>> I'm using OMPI 1.6.4 in a Torque-like environment.
>> However, since there are modifications in Torque that prevent OMPI from
>> spawning processes the way it does with MPI_COMM_SPAWN,
>
> That hasn't been true in the past - did you folks locally modify Torque
On Mar 21, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Sebastian Rinke wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm using OMPI 1.6.4 in a Torque-like environment.
> However, since there are modifications in Torque that prevent OMPI from
> spawning processes the way it does with MPI_COMM_SPAWN,
That hasn't been true in the past - did y
