Ok -- I added Galen and Sharon.
If you want to attend and haven't told me, please let me know -- I
have only reserved exactly as many phone lines as the number of people
who have attended (8, so far).
On May 27, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Sharon Melamed wrote:
Who would be interested in discussin
> Who would be interested in discussing this stuff? (me, Brian, ?
> someone from Sun?, ...?)
>
Me.
I will be there as well.
- Galen
On May 27, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
To accommodate timezones spanning from US Mountain to Israel, let's
have the teleconference tomorrow, Wednesday 28 May 2008:
- 10:30am US Eastern time
- 8:30am US Mountain time
- 5:30pm Israel time
I'll send a
Please post minutes of this meeting to OMPI-devel.
While I probably have nothing to contribute the the discussion, I and
others are interested in hearing the outcomes/conclusions.
-Paul
Jeff Squyres wrote:
To accommodate timezones spanning from US Mountain to Israel, let's
have the teleconfe
To accommodate timezones spanning from US Mountain to Israel, let's
have the teleconference tomorrow, Wednesday 28 May 2008:
- 10:30am US Eastern time
- 8:30am US Mountain time
- 5:30pm Israel time
I'll send around callin information to the following people (let me
know if anyone else wants
Hi Gleb,
Gleb Natapov wrote:
Not just that but also when swapping out or pagefault happens so even no
page pinning is needed. But HW should be designed to work with changing
page mappings and I am not sure that Mellanox HW designed for that. What
about Myricom HW?
Yes, we can support it. Howev
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:54:23AM -0400, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > That would also be great. I don't know anything about these mmu
> > notifiers (I'm not much of a kernel guy), but anything that allows us
>
> It's what Quadrics used for years in True64. Instead of try
Jeff Squyres wrote:
That would also be great. I don't know anything about these mmu
notifiers (I'm not much of a kernel guy), but anything that allows us
It's what Quadrics used for years in True64. Instead of trying to catch
at user-level all instances when the page table of a process is
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Who would be interested in discussing this stuff? (me, Brian, ?
someone from Sun?, ...?)
Me.
On May 24, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
the topic of the memory hooks came up again. Brian was wondering if
we should [finally] revisit this topic -- there's a few things that
could be done to make life "better". Two things jump to mind:
- using mallopt on Linux
What about usin
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Squyres wrote:
the topic of the memory hooks came up again. Brian was wondering if
we should [finally] revisit this topic -- there's a few things that
could be done to make life "better". Two things jump to mind:
- using mallopt on Linux
What about using the (probably) upc
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:19:01AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Brian and I were chatting the other day about random OMPI stuff and
> the topic of the memory hooks came up again. Brian was wondering if
> we should [finally] revisit this topic -- there's a few things that
> could be done to m
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Brian and I were chatting the other day about random OMPI stuff and
the topic of the memory hooks came up again. Brian was wondering if
we should [finally] revisit this topic -- there's a few things that
could be done to make life "better". Two things jump to mind:
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
