On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
Bad timing... I don't have access to the files at the moment, I'll
write back shortly (which probably means tomorrow ;-)).
Here they are:
http://spider.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~bogdan/openmpi/
Due to their size, I decided to put them up on a web serv
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Tom Mitchell wrote:
No but there are choices in how pathcc can be invoked and thus what
frontend and other chunks are active.
$ pathcc -v
QLogic PathScale(TM) Compiler Suite: Version 3.0
Built on: 2007-02-22 13:05:15 -0800
Thread model: posix
GNU gcc version 4.0.2 (PathSca
On Oct 30 02:06, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Tom Mitchell wrote:
>
> > Debian is not supported by the PathScale compiler.
>
> Thanks for your answer. In the meantime I have found a workaround for
> my situation, but I'll answer for the sake of the e-mail archives.
>
> > which
On 29 October 2007 at 20:51, Tom Mitchell wrote:
| I do not know which gcc compiler suite Debian GCC is based on.
Typically several versions of gcc et al are available at the same time --
tab-completing on my Debian testing system gives:
edd@ron:~> gcc-
gcc-3.4 gcc-4.1 gcc-4.2
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Tom Mitchell wrote:
Debian is not supported by the PathScale compiler.
Thanks for your answer. In the meantime I have found a workaround for
my situation, but I'll answer for the sake of the e-mail archives.
which one is is being used? The new Debian etch 64bit has min
On Oct 23 08:57, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
>
> >> There is in the openib BTL.
> >
> > The bug #1025 has in one the answers the following phrase:
> >
> > "It looks like this will affect many threading issues with the
> > pathscale compiler -- the open
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Brian Barrett wrote:
--without-memory-manager --enable-mca-static=btl-mx,mtl-mx
From what I understand from the FAQ, the above --enable-mca-static
option would include statically linked MX support in libmpi. But I was
building all support in (--enable-static --disable-
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it
works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmall
Hi Bogdan,
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmalloc2. I have previously tried to remove the MX
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I don't get to that point... I am not even able to use the wrapper
compilers (f.e. mpif90) to obtain an executable to run. The
segmentation fault happens when Open MPI utilities are being run, even
ompi_info.
Ahh, I thought you were getting
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Scott Atchley wrote:
Which version of MX are you using? Are you enabling the MX
registration cache (regcache)?
Can you try two runs, one exporting MX_RCACHE=1 and one exporting
MX_RCACHE=0 to all processes?
I don't get to that point... I am not even able to use the wrappe
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
I made some progress: if I configure with "--without-memory-manager"
(along with all other options that I mentioned before), then it works.
This was inspired by the fact that the segmentation fault occured in
ptmalloc2. I have previously tried
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
There is in the openib BTL.
The bug #1025 has in one the answers the following phrase:
"It looks like this will affect many threading issues with the
pathscale compiler -- the openib BTL is simply the first place we
tripped it."
which along
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jeff Squyres wrote:
There is in the openib BTL.
The bug #1025 has in one the answers the following phrase:
"It looks like this will affect many threading issues with the
pathscale compiler -- the openib BTL is simply the first place we
tripped it."
which along with th
On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
Is there some known incompatibility of the latest stable versions with
the PathScale 3.0 compilers ?
There is in the openib BTL. We've had an open issue with PathScale
for many months. They're able to reproduce the error and have
narr
15 matches
Mail list logo
