Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: New Fortran bindings

2012-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Squyres
The general consensus has been that the new Fortran stuff is ready to go in. Per Josh's comments on the original RFC, I've updated all the mpiext stuff to handle the 3 new MPI Fortran interfaces (mpif.h, use mpi, and use mpi_f08). I plan to commit this to the OMPI trunk tomorrow (Wed, Apr 18, 2

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: New Fortran bindings

2012-04-05 Thread Jeffrey Squyres
On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > All of the ones I am adding :) [most of the codes I am working with at > the moment use the fortran interfaces] You're killing me. :-) > I think the 'example' extension is the only one that has f77 > interfaces at the moment. My off-trunk branche

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: New Fortran bindings

2012-04-05 Thread Josh Hursey
All of the ones I am adding :) [most of the codes I am working with at the moment use the fortran interfaces] I think the 'example' extension is the only one that has f77 interfaces at the moment. My off-trunk branches have f77/f90 interfaces to their mpiext interfaces. I'm willing to help test/d

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: New Fortran bindings

2012-04-05 Thread Jeffrey Squyres
On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: > What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the > branch it doesn't look like it has been touched. Yeah, I've been thinking about this -- especially since you committed something relevant to mpiext the other day. You're right

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: New Fortran bindings

2012-04-05 Thread Josh Hursey
Jeff, What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the branch it doesn't look like it has been touched. -- Josh On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: > WHAT: Revamp the entire MPI Fortran bindings; new "mpifort" wrapper compiler > > WHY: Much better mpi modu