Okay, i'll bring this up at the workshop. There's been talking but no
one's working on it.
2016-03-17 8:20 GMT-06:00 Ralph Castain :
> We are also targeting RDM for now, but I agree that the two may diverge at
> some point, and so flexibility makes sense. Only wish that libfabric had a
> decent
We are also targeting RDM for now, but I agree that the two may diverge at some
point, and so flexibility makes sense. Only wish that libfabric had a decent
shared memory provider...
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:10 AM, Howard wrote:
>
> I think that's a better approach. Not clear you'd want to use
I think that's a better approach. Not clear you'd want to use same EP type as
BTL. I'm going for RDM type for now for BTL.
Howard
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 16.03.2016 um 09:35 schrieb Ralph Castain :
>
> Interesting! Yeah, we debated about BTL or go direct to OFI. Finally opted
> for t
Interesting! Yeah, we debated about BTL or go direct to OFI. Finally opted for
the latter as it seemed simpler than the BTL interface.
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 7:29 AM, Howard wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph
>
> I dont know if it's relevant, but I'm working on an ofi BTL so we can use the
> OSC rdma.
>
> H
Hi Ralph
I dont know if it's relevant, but I'm working on an ofi BTL so we can use the
OSC rdma.
Howard
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 15.03.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Ralph Castain :
>
> Hi folks
>
> We are working on integrating the RML with libfabric so we have access to
> both management Et
