It really does not matter what one does with the sm sends that can't be
posted to the FIFO, as long as they are posted at some later time. The
current implementation generates does not rely on the ordering memory
provides, but generates a sequence number and uses this in the matching,
just like an
On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:36 , Eugene Loh wrote:
George Bosilca wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 18:08 , Eugene Loh wrote:
(Probably this message only for George, but I'll toss it out to
the alias/archive.)
Actually, maybe Rich should weigh in here, too. This relates to the
overflow mechanism
George Bosilca wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 18:08 , Eugene Loh wrote:
(Probably this message only for George, but I'll toss it out to the
alias/archive.)
Actually, maybe Rich should weigh in here, too. This relates to the
overflow mechanism in MCA_BTL_SM_FIFO_WRITE.
I have a question abou
On Feb 24, 2009, at 18:08 , Eugene Loh wrote:
(Probably this message only for George, but I'll toss it out to the
alias/archive.)
I have a question about the sm sendi() function. What should happen
if the sendi() function attempts to write to the FIFO, but the FIFO
is full?
The write