Once you do, we really should commit it to the trunk this time so we can
capture it for the future
On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Alex Margolin
wrote:
> Thanks jeff, I'll make it work.
>
> I'm moving my apartment tomorrow, so I hope I'll get to it on the weekend.
>
> On 28 Apr 2014 18:09, "J
Thanks jeff, I'll make it work.
I'm moving my apartment tomorrow, so I hope I'll get to it on the weekend.
On 28 Apr 2014 18:09, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote:
> If it helps, I just updated that to the most recent OMPI trunk SVN
> revision. There were at least 3 files that had conflicts, thou
If it helps, I just updated that to the most recent OMPI trunk SVN revision.
There were at least 3 files that had conflicts, though:
Skipped 'opal/mca/hwloc/base/hwloc_base_util.c' -- Node remains in conflict
Skipped 'ompi/mca/btl/usnic/btl_usnic_frag.c' -- Node remains in conflict
Skipped 'orte
Hi!
> I'm the original developer. The patch never got merged, but I have patches to
> some branches. Which version are you using?
For now, I'm not sticking to any specific version, I have spent last 3 days
trying to adapt patches from mosix.org to 1.6.X, but without significant
success :)
Whic
I'm the original developer. The patch never got merged, but I have patches
to some branches. Which version are you using?
On 24 Apr 2014 19:07, "Pavel V. Kaygorodov" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is current status of mosix support in OpenMPI?
> I have tried patches from
> http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/wikis/M
It was never committed to OMPI - it became stuck in a side branch when the
developer graduated and took a job, and never came across. Given the age, I'd
suspect that side branch is way out-of-date and probably would need some
significant effort before it could be brought into the OMPI trunk, ass
