Whether just adding a (uintptr_t) cast is sufficient or not depends on the
usage, and I don't pretend to have looked much deeper than seeing that this
macro is common to the line numbers in the warnings I quoted.
If the intent is to uniformly store a pointer then a (uintptr_t *) cast may
be approp
Arg - that raises an interesting point. This is a pointer to a 64-bit number.
Will uintptr_t resolve that problem on such platforms?
On Aug 2, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Looks like on a 32-bit platform a (uintptr_t) cast is desired in the
> OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME() macro.
>
> Warnin
