Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10'

2006-03-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Josh, * Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:55PM CET: > On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:05:29PM CET: > >>I recently ran into a build problem using the Portland 5.2 compilers > >>on Odin (x86_64). It looks like th

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

2006-03-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:55PM CET: > On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Do you still have the complete build log? The place where libopal is > >created is interesting, as well as './libtool --config'. > > Sorry I forgot to include that. Should be a

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

2006-03-21 Thread Josh Hursey
The files should be attached. Cheers, josh pg-5-2.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data On Mar 21, 2006, at 7:45 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:55PM CET: On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Do you still have the complete build log

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

2006-03-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Josh Hursey wrote on Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:20:54PM CET: > >>On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >>> > >>>Do you still have the complete build log? The place where > >>>libopal is > >>>created is interesting, as well as './libtool --config'. > The files should be attached.

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

2006-03-21 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
I vote we don't worry about this for 1.0.x. Does anyone care about PGI 5.2 in 1.0.x? If so, is it a quick/easy fix to the Makefile.am to do what Ralf proposes (and we apparently already do something similar on the trunk)? > -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org > [mailt