I'll cleanup the code and add the granular selction part. It should be ready
by monday.
--Nysal
On 6/6/07, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Ok -- so did you want to go ahead and make these changes, or did you
want me to do it?
Either way, I'd be in favor of all this stuff coming to the trunk in
the Very N
Thanks!
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Nysal Jan wrote:
I'll cleanup the code and add the granular selction part. It should
be ready by monday.
--Nysal
On 6/6/07, Jeff Squyres < jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:Ok -- so did
you want to go ahead and make these changes, or did you
want me to do it?
Hi Galen,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:19:09AM -0600, Galen Shipman wrote:
>
> > With current code this is not the case. Order tag is set during a
> > fragment
> > allocation. It seems wrong according to your description. Attached
> > patch fixes
> > this. If no specific ordering tag is provide
There is something weird with this change, and the patch reflect it.
The new argument "order" come from the PML level and might be
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER (which is kind of global) or BTL_OPENIB_LP_QP or
BTL_OPENIB_HP_QP (which are definitively Open IB related). Do you
really intend to let the PML
On May 31, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I can run the Intel MPI benchmarks OK at np=2 but at np=4,
it hangs.
Bummer.
If I change /usr/share/openmpi/mca-btl-openib-hca-params.ini
[QLogic InfiniPath]
use_eager_rdma = 0
FYI, you can change such values on the command line and/or
e
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:11 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
There is something weird with this change, and the patch reflect
it. The new argument "order" come from the PML level and might be
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER (which is kind of global) or BTL_OPENIB_LP_QP or
BTL_OPENIB_HP_QP (which are definitively Op
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> ) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
> solution or I'll trigger a vote against the patch. I vote to be
> backed out of the trunk as it export way to much knowledge from the
> Open IB BTL into the PML
I just had a discussion with Rich regarding the BTL semantics.
I think what might be helpful here is for us to have telecon to
discuss this further.
I only have one goal out of this, and that is to firmly define the
ordering semantics of the BTL, or alternatively local/remote
completion se
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
solution or I'll trigger a vote against the p
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
solution or I'll trigger a vote against the patch. I vote to be
backed out of the trunk as it export way to much know
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you to
It would be difficult for me to attend this afternoon. Tomorrow is much
better for me.
-DON
George Bosilca wrote:
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 20
I'm available this afternoon...
Brian
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:39 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapo
Okay, how is 2:30 mountain time for everyone?
I will setup a a call in if this works.
Thanks,
Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:39 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this ov
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Don Kerr wrote:
It would be difficult for me to attend this afternoon. Tomorrow is
much
better for me.
Brian and I are both out tomorrow. I think what we will do is have a
call today, report back to the group and then if necessary have
another call on Mond
Call in details:
I have scheduled your requested audio conference "Open MPI" for today
beginning at 2:30pm to 3:30pm mountain time with 7 ports.
Dial in number: 5-4165 local 866-260-0475 toll free
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Do
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:38:51PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> >>) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
> >>solution or I'll trigger a vote against
Everyone:
George thought this was okay after the discussion, I should have made
the wiki prior to my commit as it did look very Open IB specific.
please review:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/BTLSemantics
Let me know if you want to discuss this further and we can setup a
call ear
18 matches
Mail list logo
