This is a bit off-topic for this list, but I was wondering if anyone
has any experience working with ptpd (precision time protocol daemon;
following the IEEE 1588 spec). The point of ptpd is to give better
time precision than NTP; NTP gives accuracy on the order of
miliseconds where ptpd/I
Hello,
Since some time I'm testing Open MPI at the HRLS. My main topic there is the
thread support of Open MPI.
Some time ago I found a segmentation fault when running the svn-trunk Version.
Thanks to the help of Sven I could locate it now to be in the shared memory
btl. (ompi/mca/btl/sm/btl_
On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Ralph H Castain wrote:
2. It may be useful to have some high-level parameters to specify a
specific run-time environment, since ORTE has multiple, related
frameworks (e.g., RAS and PLS). E.g., "orte_base_launcher=tm", or
somesuch.
I was just writing this up in an
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Ralph H Castain wrote:
2. It may be useful to have some high-level parameters to specify a
specific run-time environment, since ORTE has multiple, related
frameworks (e.g., RAS and PLS). E.g., "orte_base_launcher=tm", or
somesuch.
I
Interesting point - no reason why we couldn't use that functionality for
this purpose. Good idea!
On 7/11/07 5:38 AM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>
>>> 2. It may be useful to have some high-level parameters to specify a
>>> specific run-time envi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Christoph Niethammer wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Since some time I'm testing Open MPI at the HRLS. My main topic there is the
> thread support of Open MPI.
>
> Some time ago I found a segmentation fault when running the svn-trunk
> Version.
> Thanks to the
Scott Atchley wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Tim Prins wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 03:11:45 pm Scott Atchley wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Scott Atchley wrote:
Tim, starting with the recently released 1.2.1, it is the default.
To clarify, MX_RCACHE=1 is the default.
It would b
On Jul 11, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Ralph H Castain wrote:
2. It may be useful to have some high-level parameters to specify a
specific run-time environment, since ORTE has multiple, related
frameworks (e.g., RAS and PLS).
Some supplementary information to the wiki at
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/CrayXT3.
I. Accessing the Open MPI source:
* Subversion is installed on redstorm in /projects/unsupported/bin
* Reddish has subversion in the default path (you don't have to load a
module)
* The proxy i
Ups, sended to wrong list, forwarded here...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lisandro Dalcin
List-Post: devel@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Jul 11, 2007 8:58 PM
Subject: failures runing mpi4py testsuite, perhaps Comm.Split()
To: Open MPI
Hello all, after a long time I'm here again. I
Lisandro,
The two errors you provide are quite different. The first one has
been addresses few days ago in the trunk (https://svn.open-mpi.org/
trac/ompi/changeset/15291). If instead of the 1.2.3 you use anything
after r15291 you will be safe in a threading case.
The second is different. T
On 7/11/07, George Bosilca wrote:
The two errors you provide are quite different. The first one has
been addresses few days ago in the trunk (https://svn.open-mpi.org/
trac/ompi/changeset/15291). If instead of the 1.2.3 you use anything
after r15291 you will be safe in a threading case.
Please
12 matches
Mail list logo