Re: [OMPI devel] MPI_Win_get_group

2007-07-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jul 28, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: In the mean time, I would prefer to follow the standard as close as possible. If not, some external, stupid test suite (like the one I have for mip4py) would report that OMPI is wrong about this point. What exactly are you testing for? BTW,

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI_Comm_free with MPI_COMM_SELF

2007-07-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
It looks like there is a check for COMM_SELF in comm_free.c that explicitly calls the error handler on COMM_WORLD; it looks like this was introduced in the very first implementation of COMM_FREE way back in r983. I don't see any reason why this would be the case; I'm guessing it's a bug b

Re: [OMPI devel] freeing GROUP_EMPTY

2007-07-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
It looks like an explicit check for MPI_GROUP_EMPTY was removed from group_free.c in r2623 by Edgar. I suspect that there is some subtle reason for this. Edgar: do you have any recollection why this is? And how we can otherwise avoid the segv? On Jul 28, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Lisandro Dalc