Re: [OMPI devel] MPI_Win_get_group

2007-08-07 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
On 8/6/07, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > > Because many predefined, intrinsic objects cannot (or should not be > > able to) be freed, acording to the standard. > > I understand that. :-) But why would you call XXX.Free() on an > intrinsic object? If

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI_Win_get_group

2007-08-07 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
On 8/1/07, Jeff Squyres wrote: > BTW, I totally forgot to mention a notable C++ MPI bindings project > that is the next-generation/successor to OMPI: the Boost C++ MPI > bindings (boost.mpi). > > http://www.generic-programming.org/~dgregor/boost.mpi/doc/ > > I believe there's also python bind

[OMPI devel] Changing btp_openib_receive_queues default value

2007-08-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
Galen and I were looking at the default value for btl_openib_receive_queues value today and noticed that the first P value seems to be quite low (i.e., they're what Galen used to *force* flow control while he was debugging the new protocol). We propose changing it to: P,128,256,128,1