Hi,
I would like to make my own btl component for shared memory, and use that
instead of the sm component.
First off I would just copy the current sm component, give it another name
and see if I can get that to load instead.
Is there an elegant way of adding components, any documentation on
The elegant way is to go the way you are going. Basically you need to
provide open and close to the mca framework, init and finalize to
the btl framework and populate all the functions defined in btl.h and
btl/base/base.h. Copying an already existing btl is the best way not
to forget anybo
You can always start from scratch using the template in the btl
directory ...
george.
On Oct 11, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Aurelien Bouteiller wrote:
The elegant way is to go the way you are going. Basically you need to
provide open and close to the mca framework, init and finalize to
the btl fra
If you copy the sm btl, be sure to change all function names /
variables from "*btl_sm_..." to "*btl__...". The
OMPI configure/build/run system requires that the name of the
component be the same as:
- the directory that it lives in under ompi/mca/btl
- the well-known component struct
- th
Sorry for the duplication in devel-core. As suggested, this RFC is
now posted on devel.
Deadline: October 19th 2007.
Short version: We need one additional field in the ompi_request_t
struct which contain a callback to be called when a request complete.
This callback is not intended for the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:43:44AM +0200, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> David --
>
> Gleb and I just actively re-looked at this problem yesterday; we
> think it's related to https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/
> 1015. We previously thought this ticket was a different problem, but
> our analys
Reminder -- this RFC expires tonight.
Speak now or forever hold your peace...
On Oct 5, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
WHAT: Remove the mvapi BTL for the v1.3 release.
WHY: None of the IB vendors want to maintain it anymore; our future
is OFED. If someone still has mvapi IB drivers,
What: Change the mpicc/mpicxx/mpif77/mpif90 from being binaries to being
shell scripts
Why: Our build environment assumes that wrapper compilers will use the same
binary format that the Open MPI libraries do. In cross-compile environment,
the MPI wrapper compilers will run on the front-end and n
On Oct 10, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
George has proposed to bring the DDT over from the trunk to the v1.2
branch before v1.2.5 in order to fix some pending bugs.
What does this entail (ie does this affect the pml interface at all)?
George will have to answer this -- George? (he'
How long will the 1.2 series be maintained?
This has been giving some of our customers a bit of heart burn, but it
can also be used to help push through the OFED upgrades on the
clusters (a good thing).
Josh
On 10/11/07, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Reminder -- this RFC expires tonight.
>
> Speak now
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack there
and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like"
friendliness on Windows.
As a temporary solution and until we can figure out how many people
use m
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack
there and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like"
friendliness on Windows.
As a temporary solutio
Sounds perfect. I'll vote for it.
Thanks,
george.
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack
there and
Hello Open MPI Developers,
Here's a small patch to fix a misnamed cache variable. The next
Autoconf version will issue a warning for typos like these, which
is how I found this.
Cheers,
Ralf
* config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY):
Rename ompi_cv_cc_fvisibility
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:36:53PM CEST:
>
> * config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY):
> Rename ompi_cv_cc_fvisibility to ompi_vc_cc_fvisibility, so
> that it will be cached.
Of course then I get it wrong myself. I meant to write:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
George will have to answer this -- George? (he's on pseudo-vacation
for the next 10 days)
No, no, no. It's not pseudo at all :) It's as real as possible, when
one still have access to email ... Anyway, I'm working out a way to
enjoy every
Thanks Ralf.
Patch pushed in the trunk (commit 16435).
george.
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:36:53PM CEST:
* config/ompi_check_visibility.m4 (OMPI_CHECK_VISIBILITY):
Rename ompi_cv_cc_fvisibility to o
Josh and I are talking off-list with specific regards to his customers before I
delete the mvapi btl.
-jms
Sent from my PDA
-Original Message-
From: Josh Aune [mailto:lu...@lnxi.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 05:15 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject:
18 matches
Mail list logo
