Re: [OMPI devel] Multi-Rail and Open IB BTL

2007-11-13 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Don Kerr wrote: both, I was thinking of listing what I think are multi-rail requirements but wanted to understand what the current state of things are I believe the OF portion of the FAQ describes what we do in the v1.2 series (right Gleb?); I honestly don't rem

Re: [OMPI devel] initial SCTP BTL commit comments?

2007-11-13 Thread Jeff Squyres
I have no objections to bringing this into the trunk, but I agree that an .ompi_ignore is probably a good idea at first. One question that I'd like to have answered is how OMPI decides whether to use the SCTP BTL or not. If there are SCTP stacks available by default in Linux and OS X -- bu

Re: [OMPI devel] initial SCTP BTL commit comments?

2007-11-13 Thread Brad Penoff
On Nov 12, 2007 3:26 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I have no objections to bringing this into the trunk, but I agree that > an .ompi_ignore is probably a good idea at first. I'll try to cook up a commit soon then! > One question that I'd like to have answered is how OMPI decides > whether to use the

Re: [OMPI devel] initial SCTP BTL commit comments?

2007-11-13 Thread Brad Penoff
On Nov 13, 2007 12:41 PM, Brad Penoff wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007 3:26 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > I have no objections to bringing this into the trunk, but I agree that > > an .ompi_ignore is probably a good idea at first. > > I'll try to cook up a commit soon then! It's in there now! https://svn.