[OMPI devel] heterogeneous support

2008-06-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
I just noticed that heterogeneous MPI support is enabled by default. Do we really want this? Doesn't it add a little overhead (probably noticeable on shared memory)? I'd be comfortable with users specifically having to enable heterogeneous support via configure and having [slightly] bette

Re: [OMPI devel] heterogeneous support

2008-06-05 Thread Brian W. Barrett
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Jeff Squyres wrote: I just noticed that heterogeneous MPI support is enabled by default. Do we really want this? Doesn't it add a little overhead (probably noticeable on shared memory)? I'd be comfortable with users specifically having to enable heterogeneous support via co

Re: [OMPI devel] heterogeneous support

2008-06-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
Good call -- I just checked ompi/proc/proc.c and we *do* check. If you start a heterogeneous job and we don't have support for it, we show_help and barf. I'll change the default tonight. On Jun 5, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Jeff Squyres wrote: I just

Re: [OMPI devel] some Makefile.am questions

2008-06-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: 1) This is from test/Makefile.am: --- snip --- # This should be libsupport.a, not libsupport.la. Automake doesn't # support check_LTLIBRARIES, as technically you have to install a # shared library before you can use it. # check_LIBRARIES = lib