When compiling the latest trunk under SLES 9 I am seeing the following
error:
../../../../../opal/mca/maffinity/libnuma/maffinity_libnuma_module.c:118:
error: `MPOL_MF_MOVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
Looks like SLES 9 numaif.h does not support MPOL_MF_MOVE. Can we
somehow make
Last night's tarball failed with the same problem.
Lenny is looking into it (I asked him about it on IM).
On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
When compiling the latest trunk under SLES 9 I am seeing the
following error:
../../../../../opal/mca/maffinity/libnuma/maffinity_libnu
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:25 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Please search through the archives of this list; as Brian mentioned,
this topic has come up several times before. It's fairly boring to
keep repeating the same arguments; we have lots of *new* things to
argue about these days. ;-)
Unfortunat
On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I completely agree that we should follow the standard to the
greatest possible extend, but then at least we should have our test
codes following the same guidelines. It doesn't means I volunteer
for anything ...
I'm not sure what you mean
Which tests are you referring to?
On Jun 16, 2008, at 11:09 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I completely agree that we should follow the standard to the
greatest possible extend, but then at least we should have our
test codes following the sam
I pinged the VT guys about this a little over a week ago -- they
indicated interest in seeing the Coverity results. I'm waiting for
their desired usernames before requesting accounts for them.
Additionally, note that we have a wiki page about OMPI's use of
Coverity:
https://svn.open-
Lenny and I fixed it in r18659 -- sorry, it's a configure change...
On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Last night's tarball failed with the same problem.
Lenny is looking into it (I asked him about it on IM).
On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
When compiling th
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Lenny and I fixed it in r18659 -- sorry, it's a configure change...
thanks.
--td
On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Last night's tarball failed with the same problem.
Lenny is looking into it (I asked him about it on IM).
On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:06 AM, T
FYI -- in case you hadn't already noticed, the Coverity results are a
bit out of date (last run was 5/28/08). It looks like they're going
through some growing pains -- see my mail to David below, and his
reply below that.
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Maxwell
Date: June 10, 2008
