Per yesterday's concall I did some experiments with the padding changes
and looking at MPI_Comm structures in dbx. I believe the concern from
George Bosilca was that using the padding changes you wouldn't be able
to print out the structures values.
What I found with dbx and Sun Studio is that
Any chance of a conference call, this is very interesting issue , but
we can't attend in person :(
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> Rich Graham
>>> Brian Barrett
>>> George Bosilca
>>> Thomas Herault
>>>
Sure, we cam do that. .ajor problem will be the timezone diff...
-jms
Sent from my PDA. No type good.
-Original Message-
From: Lenny Verkhovsky [mailto:lenny.verkhov...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:56 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject:
Hi Jeff,
Interesting, did the 1.2 downloads drop off because of lack of interest,
or did it drop off because 1.3 became the default, 1.2 is no longer visible
and the only reference is on the sidebar labeled as "old" ?
Jim
//
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Someone just asked me,
Hi folks
I believe a recent commit has broken the trunk - I am unable to
compile it on either Linux or Mac:
In file included from convertor_raw.c:24:
../../ompi/datatype/datatype_pack.h: In function ‘pack_predefined_data’:
../../ompi/datatype/datatype_pack.h:41: error: implicit declaration of
Actually, check that - it seems to be building under Linux (my build
broke in some other area where I am working, but not here).
However, it does not build on the Mac.
Any suggestions?
Ralph
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
I believe a recent commit has broken t
Rats - once I fixed my area, it again broke on Linux at this same spot
in convertor.
Sorry for the confusion
Ralph
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Actually, check that - it seems to be building under Linux (my
build broke in some other area where I am working, but not he
Seems more like a compiler problem. A static inline function defined
in the header file but never used is the source of the problem. It did
compile for me with the gcc from Leopard and 4.3.1 on Linux. I'll
commit the fix asap.
george.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 14:26 , Ralph Castain wrote:
Rat
Thanks George!
It wouldn't compile for me on my Leopard or on any of our Linux
clusters, nor on the IU odin Linux cluster. Not sure why - all were
with different versions of gcc.
Thanks again
Ralph
On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:48 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Seems more like a compiler problem. A st
