[OMPI devel] PML/ob1 problem

2009-02-11 Thread Mike Dubman
Hello guys, I'm running some experimental tcp btl which implements rdma GET method and advertises it in its flags of the btl API. The btl`s send() method returns rc=1 to select fast path for PML. (this optimization was added in revision 18551 in v1.3) It seems that in PML/ob1, mca_pml_ob1_send_re

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Rename several OMPI_* names to OPAL_*

2009-02-11 Thread Ralph Castain
Sounds reasonable to me - but again, let's commit it when we do the 1.4 branch so maintaining 1.3 doesn't become impossible. On Feb 10, 2009, at 2:38 PM, George Bosilca wrote: These changes look fine to me. However, I would like to amend this proposal to include the splitting of the config

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Rename several OMPI_* names to OPAL_*

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Koenig
This is a pretty good suggestion; I think it could be useful to what we're trying to do with STCI, but I can see that it could be generally useful to others as well. As long as nobody objects on the grounds that this is too much to put into a single RFC, I can work towards the goal of incorporatin

[OMPI devel] possible bugs and unexpected values in returned errors classes

2009-02-11 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
Below a list of stuff that I've got by running mpi4py testsuite. Never reported them before just because some of them are not actually errors, but anyway, I want to raise the discussion. - Likely bugs (regarding my interpretation of the MPI standard) 1) When passing MPI_REQUEST_NULL, MPI_Request_