If it would help in tracking this problem to give someone access to
Sif, I can probably make that happen. Just let me know.
Cheers,
Josh
On May 5, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 5, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
You and Terry saw something that was occ
We have used several different methods for binding processes over the
years. Our current method is based on having the orted pass
environmental parameters to the individual processes when it fork/
exec's them, and then having each process bind itself to the specified
processor(s) during MPI_
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Ralph Castain wrote:
Any thoughts on this? Should we change it?
Yes, we should change this (IMHO) :).
If so, who wants to be involved in the re-design? I'm pretty sure it would
require some modification of the paffinity framework, plus some minor mods to
the odls framewo
I am using the system openmpi (1.2.3) on Mac OS X 10.5.6, gcc 4.0.1. I
believe these are all the standard tools.
If I mpirun as:
mpirun -n 2 ./a.out
Using the test code from http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/doc/html/mpi/getting_started.html#mpi.config
(note that at the moment I have not
Apologies, soon after I sent my mail I managed to solve my own problem.
For possible future reference, the problem was that my disconnected
ethernet port had somehow decided to take up residence on the same
subnet as my wireless. The relevant parts of ifconfig are:
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
Thanks!
Would you mind if I posted this on www.open-mpi.org?
On Apr 25, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Timothy Hayes wrote:
I uploaded it to http://www.hotshare.net/file/131218-829472246c.html
I'm not sure if it's any good or even if it's 100% accurate; but if
someone gets any use out of it, that woul
Hi Jeff,
As far as I am concerned, I have no problems. It would be much better that
everyone knows about the OpenMPI tcp/ip internals.
Regards
Pranav
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Would you mind if I posted this on www.open-mpi.org?
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2009,
You wouldn't happen to have a bibtext reference, would you?
On May 6, 2009, at 5:04 PM, pranav jadhav wrote:
Hi Jeff,
As far as I am concerned, I have no problems. It would be much
better that everyone knows about the OpenMPI tcp/ip internals.
Regards
Pranav
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Are you talking about my document? If so, that's no problem at all. If there
are any mistakes in my facts just let me know and I'll change them.
Tim
2009/5/6 Jeff Squyres
> Thanks!
>
> Would you mind if I posted this on www.open-mpi.org?
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Timothy Hayes wrote
Yes, I'm talking about your document -- sorry -- I just replied to the
wrong guy! :-)
If you have a bibtex reference for it, that would be most helpful.
On May 6, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Timothy Hayes wrote:
Are you talking about my document? If so, that's no problem at all.
If there are any mi
Would this be okay?
@misc{hayes09_ugrad_xenmpi,
author = {Timothy Hayes},
title = {An Effcient Open MPI Transport System for Virtual Worker Nodes},
howpublished = {Trinity College Dublin Final Year Project},
year = {2009},
note = "Undergraduate Dissertation",
}
It's really just a rep
11 matches
Mail list logo
