Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: IPv6 support

2009-09-17 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 16, 2009, at 11:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: WHAT: change the IPv6 configuration option to enable IPv6 if and only if specifically requested At configure or run-time? I [marginally] prefer a run-time determination. E.g., if we can test at run-time "ipv6 wasn't specifically requeste

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: IPv6 support

2009-09-17 Thread Ralph Castain
On Sep 17, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Sep 16, 2009, at 11:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: WHAT: change the IPv6 configuration option to enable IPv6 if and only if specifically requested At configure or run-time? I [marginally] prefer a run-time determination. E.g., if we can

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI_Request_get_status and opal_progress [PATCH]

2009-09-17 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 14, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Shaun Jackman wrote: Two questions. Should the loop label recheck_request_status come before or after the call to opal_atomic_mb? I believe that a 2nd mb is necessary. But I think it could be put into the "if" block at the end, and leave the label where it is.

Re: [OMPI devel] Dynamic languages, dlopen() issues, and symbol visibility of libtool ltdl API in current trunk

2009-09-17 Thread Josh Hursey
So I started down this road a couple months ago. I was using the lt_dlopen() and friends in the OPAL CRS self module. The visibility changes broke that functionality. The one solution that I started implementing was precisely what you suggested, wrapping a subset the libtool calls and prefi