If I specify two hosts and no "slots" information, processes should be
started in equal numbers on the two hosts. But, how should they be
ranked? "Block" or "cyclic" (round robin)? Did we change this behavior
recently?
% ompi_info | grep "Open MPI:"
Open MPI: 1.3.4a1r22009
Okay, my e-mail below just crossed with another one explaining that
behavior has recently been intentionally changed. I'll go chew on that
for a while.
Eugene Loh wrote:
If I specify two hosts and no "slots" information, processes should be
started in equal numbers on the two hosts. But, ho
On 10/07/09 13:52, George Bosilca wrote:
Don,
The problem is that a particular BTL doesn't have the knowledge about
the other selected BTL, so allowing the BTLs to set this limit is not
as easy as it sound. However, in the case two identical BTLs are
selected and that they are the only ones
Don,
I think we can do something slightly different that will satisfy
everybody.
How about a solution where each BTL will define a limit where a
message will never be shared with another BTL? We can have two such
limits, one for the send protocol and one for the RMA (it will apply
eithe
I think we're missing a couple semicolons (see below).
On Thu, Oct/08/2009 01:53:43PM, r...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: rhc
> Date: 2009-10-08 13:53:43 EDT (Thu, 08 Oct 2009)
> New Revision: 22077
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/22077
>
> Log:
> Closes #2048: Fix uninitialized
Fixed - thanks!
On Oct 8, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
I think we're missing a couple semicolons (see below).
On Thu, Oct/08/2009 01:53:43PM, r...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
Author: rhc
Date: 2009-10-08 13:53:43 EDT (Thu, 08 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 22077
URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/om
I'm making travel plans for SC09 and was wondering if there is going
to be an OMPI gathering during that time. During the week would be
grand but I'd hate to make plans to depart Friday (11/20) only to
discover that's the date.
Are there plans in the works already?
--
David Gunter
HPC-3:
I just found the BOF session schedule for Wednesday of that
week...sorry for the spam.
-david
--
David Gunter
HPC-3: Parallel Tools Team
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:59 PM, David Gunter wrote:
I'm making travel plans for SC09 and was wondering if there is going
to b
George,
This is an interesting approach although I am guessing the changes would
be wide spread and have many performance implications. Am I wrong in
this belief?
-DON
On 10/08/09 11:45, George Bosilca wrote:
Don,
I think we can do something slightly different that will satisfy
everybody.
