Re: [OMPI devel] binding with MCA parameters: broken or user error?

2009-10-12 Thread Terry Dontje
In regards to the "-mca XXX" option not overriding the file setting I thought I saw this working for v1.3. However, I just retested this and I am seeing the same issue of the "-mca" option not affecting orte_process_binding or rmaps_base_schedule_policy. This seems to work under the trunk. I

[OMPI devel] segv in coll tuned

2009-10-12 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
Hi, I experience the following error with current trunk r22090. It also occures in 1.3 branch. #~/work/svn/ompi/branches/1.3//build_x86-64/install/bin/mpirun -H witch21 -np 4 -mca coll_tuned_use_dynamic_rules 1 ./IMB-MPI1 Sometimes it's error, and sometimes it's segv. It recreates with np>4. [witch

Re: [OMPI devel] segv in coll tuned

2009-10-12 Thread Terry Dontje
Does that test also pass sometimes? I am seeing some random set of tests segv'ing in the SM btl, using a v1.3 derivative. --td Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: Hi, I experience the following error with current trunk r22090. It also occures in 1.3 branch. #~/work/svn/ompi/branches/1.3//build_x86-64/ins

Re: [OMPI devel] segv in coll tuned

2009-10-12 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
not since I started testing it :) it failes somewhere in ompi_coll_tuned_get_target_method_params function, I am taking a look right now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Terry Dontje wrote: > Does that test also pass sometimes? I am seeing some random set of tests > segv'ing in the SM btl, usi

Re: [OMPI devel] segv in coll tuned

2009-10-12 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
well, I see that it returnes 0 at this line, since base_com_rule->n_msg_sizes==0 coll_tuned_dynamic_rules.c +359 if( (NULL == base_com_rule) || (0 == base_com_rule->n_msg_sizes)) { return (0); } Sometimes it passes if I tell IMB -npmin 4. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Lenny Verkhovsky < len

Re: [OMPI devel] binding with MCA parameters: broken or user error?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralph Castain
I fixed the process schedule issue on the trunk over the weekend (not moved to 1.3 yet while it "soaked") - the binding issue was working fine on the trunk. I believe I applied the fix to stop calling register_params twice to 1.3 already, but I can check. On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Terr

Re: [OMPI devel] binding with MCA parameters: broken or user error?

2009-10-12 Thread Terry Dontje
Ralph Castain wrote: I fixed the process schedule issue on the trunk over the weekend (not moved to 1.3 yet while it "soaked") - the binding issue was working fine on the trunk. So there was an issue of "-mca orte_process_binding" not being interpreted? I believe I applied the fix to stop cal

Re: [OMPI devel] binding with MCA parameters: broken or user error?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralph Castain
On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: Ralph Castain wrote: I fixed the process schedule issue on the trunk over the weekend (not moved to 1.3 yet while it "soaked") - the binding issue was working fine on the trunk. So there was an issue of "-mca orte_process_binding" not being

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI users] cartofile

2009-10-12 Thread Eugene Loh
This e-mail was on the users alias... see http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2009/09/10710.php There wasn't much response, so let me ask another question.  How about if we remove the cartofile section from the DESCRIPTION section of the OMPI mpirun man page?  It's a lot of text that