Re: [OMPI devel] === CREATE FAILURE (trunk) ===

2010-02-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
The build machine at IU was running out of disk space. I'm not 100% sure that this is the underlying error, but I'm going to kick off another build and see if we get the same dist error. If so, I'll dig more. On Feb 7, 2010, at 9:13 PM, MPI Team wrote: > > ERROR: Command returned a non-zero

Re: [OMPI devel] Create success (r1.7a1r22577)

2010-02-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
Yay. :-) On Feb 8, 2010, at 4:28 PM, MPI Team wrote: > Creating nightly snapshot SVN tarball was a success. > > Snapshot: 1.7a1r22577 > Start time: Mon Feb 8 15:56:14 EST 2010 > End time: Mon Feb 8 16:28:48 EST 2010 > > Your friendly daemon, > Cyrador > __

Re: [OMPI devel] New feature for SVN commit messages

2010-02-08 Thread Josh Hursey
It looks like this is fixed now. Let us know if you see any other issues with it. -- Josh On Feb 5, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: IU has been having some problems with this -- let me ping the admin and see what happened (I also saw your commit go by and noticed that no CMR ticket

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: s/ENABLE_MPI_THREADS/ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY/g

2010-02-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
How about --enable-mpi-threads ==> --enable-multi-threads ENABLE_MPI_THREADS ==>ENABLE_MULTI_THREADS Essentially, s/mpi/multi/ig. This gives us "progress thread" support and "multi thread" support. Similar, but different. Another possibility instead of "mpi" could be "concurrent

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: s/ENABLE_MPI_THREADS/ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY/g

2010-02-08 Thread Barrett, Brian W
Well, does --disable-multi-threads disable progress threads? And do you want to disable thread support in ORTE because you don't want MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE? Perhaps a third option is a rational way to go? Brain On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > How about > > --enable-mpi-thr