-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/11/10 09:17, Sébastien Boisvert wrote:
> As Mr. George Bosilca underlined, since the same test case works for
> small messages, the problem is about congestion of the FIFOs which leads
> to resource locking, and as you wrote, deadlock.
Hmm, we'
Yes, Ray version 0.1.0 and below are not fully-compliant with MPI 2.2.
I will release Ray 1.0.0 as soon as my regression tests are done. That
should be tomorrow.
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 à 00:01 -0500, Christopher Samuel a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/11/10 16:32, Sébastien Boisvert wrote:
> Yes, Ray version 0.1.0 and below are not fully-compliant
> with MPI 2.2.
>
> I will release Ray 1.0.0 as soon as my regression tests
> are done. That should be tomorrow.
Wonderful, thank you! :-)
- --
Hi Jeff,
Here is the unified diff.
As only the romio subtree is modified, I made the following command:
diff -u -r -x .svn ompi-trunk/ompi/mca/io/romio/romio/
NEW-ROMIO-FOR-OPENMPI/ompi/mca/io/romio/romio/ > DIFF_UPDATE
tar cvzf DIFF_UPDATE.TGZ DIFF_UPDATE
Compilation is OK. I run the ROMIO
Hello,
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:03 -0500, George Bosilca wrote:
> If you know the max size of the receives I would take a different approach.
> Post few persistent receives, and manage them in a circular buffer. Instead
> of doing an MPI_Iprobe, use MPI_Test on the current head of your circular