Hi Jeff,
Thanks, fixed - see r24852.
Basically, I did what you wrote here, with some small modifications.
Hope that this is OK this time.
-- YK
On 29-Jun-11 5:59 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> That's still not quite right, per OMPI conventions.
>
> If you don't find it, you shouldn't warn, you shoul
Hi Jeff,
On 02-Jul-11 11:52 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Were all the issueswith this code fixed? There were m4 issues and solaris
> issues, IIRC.
I took all the fixes I could find based on the trac:
"Be sure also to look at r24196; Josh committed a
bunch of warning fixes for you aft
Hi Jeff,
> Does your llp sed path order MPI matching ordering? Eg if some prior isend
> is already queued, could the llp send overtake it?
Yes, LLP send may overtake queued isend.
But we use correct PML send_sequence. So the LLP message is queued as
unexpected message on receiver side, and I th
