Can you explain that a little more? Are you -10'ing the whole concept? Or
just renaming xpmem? Or ...?
On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:37 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> -10!
>
> george.
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 08:38 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> 1. Personally, I would love to rename the openib BTL to so
Maybe he is -10!'ing, which is worst than -10'ing!
On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Can you explain that a little more? Are you -10'ing the whole concept? Or
> just renaming xpmem? Or ...?
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:37 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> -10!
>>
>> george.
>>
I was expressing my support to the name-aliasing idea. I can't imagine a more
confusing experience from a user perspective.
george.
On Nov 23, 2011, at 14:52 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Can you explain that a little more? Are you -10'ing the whole concept? Or
> just renaming xpmem? Or ...?
>
But __way__ better than -10!'ing!
george.
On Nov 24, 2011, at 07:14 , Leonardo Fialho wrote:
> Maybe he is -10!'ing, which is worst than -10'ing!
>
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> Can you explain that a little more? Are you -10'ing the whole concept? Or
>> just ren
I would agree (quick - defibrillator for George!). This is like rolling out a
howitzer to remove a dust spec from your floor.
Nathan gave a perfectly reasonable explanation for his choice of name. I know
some of us can be really anal-retentive, but this is going beyond reason. Just
leave the na
