[OMPI devel] openib Dynamic SL opensm-devel usage

2012-06-18 Thread TERRY DONTJE
I've ran into an issue compiling openib's Dynamic SL support on a RH 6.2 based system with the Oracle Studio compilers. Turns out if I compile btl_openib_connect_sl.c with the Oracle Studio compilers with the "-g" option the compiler compiles some static inline functions in ib_types.h standal

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Pineapple Runtime Interposition Project

2012-06-18 Thread Josh Hursey
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Hi Josh > > I had a chance to review your code this morning, and generally find it is > okay with me. I see a couple of things that appear to limit it, though they > may be intentional: In this pass of the pineapple interface I included o

Re: [OMPI devel] openib Dynamic SL opensm-devel usage

2012-06-18 Thread TERRY DONTJE
Nevermind the below post. I was wrong about opensm-devel not existing on OL6.2. However I still have the issue of dependency on libosmcomp.so that I would like to put into ompi_check_openib.m4. Anyone against me putting a dependency on libosmcomp.so for btl_openib_connect_sl.o ? --td On 6/

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Pineapple Runtime Interposition Project

2012-06-18 Thread Ralph Castain
No disagreement over the approach - having the interface only cover OMPI as it sits is fine. As I said at the meeting, those of us using ORTE for other purposes have no real reason to need "pineapple" and can just work directly with the ORTE interfaces (GP will commit to this route). Based on th

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Pineapple Runtime Interposition Project

2012-06-18 Thread Josh Hursey
That sounds good. The approach for this project can be seen as multi-phased. Phase 0: Baseline - Baseline implementation of just the interfaces that OMPI uses. - This is what I want to commit to the trunk next week. Phases 1-N: Interface enhancements - There are a number of suggested enhancem

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hide btl segment keys within btl

2012-06-18 Thread Rolf vandeVaart
Hi Nathan: I downloaded and tried it out. There were a few issues that I had to work through, but finally got things working. Can you apply this patch to your changes prior to checking things in? I also would suggest configuring with --enable-picky as there are something like 10 warnings genera

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hide btl segment keys within btl

2012-06-18 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Rolf, I updated my bitbucket base on your and George's comments. Let me know if you find any more problems. -Nathan On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:18:20AM -0700, Rolf vandeVaart wrote: > Hi Nathan: > I downloaded and tried it out. There were a few issues that I had to work > through, but finally g