On Jul 19, 2013, at 17:57 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> I've now talked to both George and Nathan. Let me summarize for the web
> archives / community:
>
> 1. There are two main points of contention:
>
> 1a. ompi_info has a *very long-standing precedent* behavior of using
> MCA para
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:57:09PM +0200, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 17:57 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> > I've now talked to both George and Nathan. Let me summarize for the web
> > archives / community:
> >
> > 1. There are two main points of contention:
> >
>
The ompi/mca/rcache/rb component has been .ompi_ignored for almost 7 years.
Should we delete it?
---
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain
confidential information.
+1
On Aug 27, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Rolf vandeVaart
wrote:
> The ompi/mca/rcache/rb component has been .ompi_ignored for almost 7 years.
> Should we delete it?
>
>
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential information. Any unauthori
I agree. Unless anyone is using this it should go away.
-Nathan
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:49:03AM -0700, Rolf vandeVaart wrote:
>The ompi/mca/rcache/rb component has been .ompi_ignored for almost 7
>years. Should we delete it?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:57:09PM +0200, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 17:57 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> > I've now talked to both George and Nathan. Let me summarize for the web
> > archives / community:
> >
> > 1. There are two main points of contention:
> >
>
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>> 1a. ompi_info has a *very long-standing precedent* behavior of using
>>> MCA params to exclude the display of components (and their
>>> params). Users have come to rely on this behavior to test that OMPI is
>>> honoring their $HOME/.openmp
