[OMPI devel] example/Hello_c.c : mpirun run failed on two physical nodes.

Hi, I am a fresh learner of OpenMPI programmer, and have some troubles on building mpi programming, hope some helps.. The example/helloc_c can works successfully with 2 process on local machine, however, do not work on two separate physical node. Physical two nodes: Eg: [root@bb-nsi-ib04 examp

Re: [OMPI devel] example/Hello_c.c : mpirun run failed on two physical nodes.

Try this FAQ entry: http://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=running#diagnose-multi-host-problems On Mar 25, 2014, at 6:54 AM, "Wang,Yanfei(SYS)" wrote: > Hi, > > I am a fresh learner of OpenMPI programmer, and have some troubles on > building mpi programming, hope some helps.. > > The examp

[OMPI devel] common_verbs fix

Mike / Vasily / Alina -- Are you guys using ompi_common_verbs_find_ports() somewhere? I don't see it being used anyhere other than the usnnic btl. I ask because I was planning to consolidate this part of common verbs up into the usnic BTL in the not-distant future because no one else was using

Re: [OMPI devel] common_verbs fix

Hi Jeff, We are working on "mxm" btl and plan to use some "common" verbs APIs from it. Regards On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Mike / Vasily / Alina -- > > Are you guys using ompi_common_verbs_find_ports() somewhere? I don't see > it being used anyhere othe

[OMPI devel] Open MPI developer meeting: Chicago, June

We're going to have another face-to-face OMPI developer meeting after the next MPI Forum meeting: - Chicago Cisco facility - June 5, Thu afternoon - June 6 Fri morning - Sign up on the wiki page if you will attend: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/Jun14Meeting -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...

[OMPI devel] v1.7 SVN branch is CLOSED

Unless there is some kind of extraordinary circumstance, the v1.7 SVN branch is hereby CLOSED. No new nightly tarballs will be generated off the v1.7 branch. The v1.8 SVN branch has been created. I am creating a first nightly tarball off the v1.8 branch right now; it will be available shortly.

[OMPI devel] v1.8[.0] guidance

I'm proxying Ralph because he's off teaching an ORTE tutorial this week, and will generally only be available in the evenings. The timeline for v1.8.0 is VERY SHORT: next Monday, March 31, 2014. Next Monday is our self-imposed deadline to meet the downstream packagers' schedules (e.g., RHEL and

[OMPI devel] Update your MTT to use v1.8

Don't forget: please update your MTT to pull from the v1.8 nightly tarballs tonight. Don't bother testing the v1.7 nightly tarballs any more. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

[OMPI devel] cleanup of rr_byobj

Hi Ralph, I moved on to the development list. I'm not sure why add_one flag is used in the rr_byobj. Here, if oversubscribed, proc is mapped to each object one by one. So, I think the add_one is not necesarry. Instead, when the user doesn't permit oversubscription, the second pass should be skip

Re: [OMPI devel] cleanup of rr_byobj

Hi Tetsuya Let me take a look when I get home this weekend - I'm giving an ORTE tutorial to a group of new developers this week and my time is very limited. Thanks Ralph On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > > Hi Ralph, I moved on to the development list. > > I'm not sure why add_one fla

Re: [OMPI devel] cleanup of rr_byobj

no problem - it's a minor cleanup. Tetsuya > Hi Tetsuya > > Let me take a look when I get home this weekend - I'm giving an ORTE tutorial to a group of new developers this week and my time is very limited. > > Thanks > Ralph > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > > Hi Ralph, I moved