Re: [OMPI devel] "maybe" issue in 1.8.5rc[23]

Yeah, I remember this one. Its a bug in that specific version of the compiler. I had reported it to the compiler team a couple of years back. Quoting from the email I sent them: The "stw r0,0(r31)" probably overwrites the previous stack pointer ? static inline int opal_atomic_cmpset_32(volati

[OMPI devel] Dead code in opal_config_asm.4

There is a block of code near the start of the OPAL_CONF_ASM which begins: # OS X Leopard ld bus errors if ... However, Leopard is OS X 10.5 and the minimum supported by Open MPI is 10.6. So, that code should be unreachable at this time (and since Jan 2014 http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists

Re: [OMPI devel] Dead code in opal_config_asm.4

Sweet -- thanks: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/commit/0afda878a2017b1d50c58cccecc5334fbb81b7dc > On Apr 24, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > There is a block of code near the start of the OPAL_CONF_ASM which begins: > # OS X Leopard ld bus errors if ... > > However, Leopa

[OMPI devel] 1.8.5....going once...going twice...

Any last minute issues people need to report? Otherwise, this baby is going to ship Paul: I will include your README suggestions as they relate to 1.8.5. Thanks, as always! Ralph

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.5....going once...going twice...

5 of the 6 MIPS and ARM testers that were still running last night have completed successfully. No reason to think the last one won't pass on rc3 as it did on rc2, if given another 2 or 3 hours to complete. -Paul On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Any last minute issues peo

[OMPI devel] Next developer face-to-face meeting: Doodle

A bunch of people have filled out the Doodle -- thanks! If you haven't done so, please fill it out by the teleconf next Tuesday, thanks: http://doodle.com/4arc4ciiby2ve222 -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_busine

Re: [OMPI devel] Suggested README changes

Sandia -- Are you ok with this change? If so, please change it on master and file a PR... (one quibble: it's "verbs", not "VERBS") > On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:25 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > More suggestions for README: > > On master I suggest s/openib/verbs/ to catch two lingering instances

[OMPI devel] My 1.8.5rc3 testing report

All done! All good! Summary: 3 Unavailable 1 Known bad[*] configuration 70 PASS -Paul [*] Compiler bug confirmed by Nysal On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Sorry my ARMv6, ARMv8 and PowerPC64LE systems were dedicated to other > purposes today. > So, I w

Re: [OMPI devel] My 1.8.5rc3 testing report

Thanks Paul !! > On Apr 24, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > All done! All good! > > Summary: > 3 Unavailable > 1 Known bad[*] configuration > 70 PASS > > -Paul > > [*] Compiler bug confirmed by Nysal > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Paul Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] powerpc64le support [1-line patch]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:19:07PM -0700, Paul Hargrove wrote: > I had an opportunity to try the 1.8.5rc2 tarball on a little-endian POWER8 > (aka ppc64el or powerpc64le). > The good news is that things "just worked" as they did when I tried ARMv8 > (aka aarch64). > This is a little off-topic, bu

Re: [OMPI devel] powerpc64le support [1-line patch]

Troy, My POWER8 is actually a QEMU emulator (same goes for my AARCH64). However, the real thing (with 2sockets * 10cores * 8threads) exists in the GCC compile farm as gcc112. It is my understanding that with IBMs hypervisor one can run both LE and BE partitions simultaneously. So, probably no re